ICLS Notes

ICLS Notes Workshop     Let’s collaborate on a library for surfacing microgenetic, theoretically-grounded writing actions.          —> Paper on collaborative writing analytics         —> Live dashboards     Collaborative writing / peer assistance writing     Journal of Writing Research     Bosco, 2008     socio-cognitive (Flower and Hayes)     socio-cultural (Graham, 2018)     Annelies Raes, PhD student at Ghent, focuses on CS / Writing. TECOL     Chrome plugin: engagement monitor     Dialogic approach: Deana Kuhn. importance of counterargument         —> Useful in in-classroom studies.          —> Use for 

    People potentially interested in creating software together         Bram de Wever         Stian Håklev         Simon Knight, Sydney             —> Rhetorical marks put into texts as discourse markers         Shibani             Rhetorical moves: Swales, 2004             Works with diffs of stories.          Dorian             Research on sequential groupwork moves             analyzing collaborative texts via network analysis…          Elizabeth Koh             Conceptual framework for collaboration.          Rafael              NLP. Put in touch with Fabio?         Adam              UT Austin, interest-driven learning          ???             Tim Hickey, collaborative code environment.          Ulrike             Distance between author and environment (alternative medicine)              —> Fake news, polarization in publics             —> How do they measure an edit’s distance from a perspective? 

        Baruch Schwartz             argumentation, collaborative learning as processes

Juror reasoning model Reid Hastie, Pennington, Kuhn, Weinstock     Narrative in the service of Argumentation 

How to bring together argumentative writing and narrative writing. 

WHERE TO GO NEXT     Add in the reading metrics     Add an API     Invitation to researchers

https://utscic.edu.au/tools/awa/

COMPUTATIONAL THINKING SYMPOSIUM

David:      Define, teach, assess

Irene: Scenario-based     —> I wanted to know how they would frame the problem. 

Shuchi:      Deeper learning

Mike Tissembaum     “computational action”

Till Temple introductory programming is “blocky” and “talky” educational computer science, programs are quiet… 

KEYNOTE IRIS TABAK

Dudhwala 2017 Doing the self

has the power to rescript activities an external voice (data) overpowers the internal voice just because it’s a dialogic voice doesn’t mean there’s a place for authority.      practices that are important in affinity group What are the effects of ongoing subordination to quantification (doesn’t this already happen?)     Are you suggesting this may be a mechanism behind extrinsic motivation being bad? Learning becomes aligning with a normative gold standard.  What gives rise to different stances? Can we design to mitigate?

RICH PAPER SESSION —> process drama