Tanner Vea job talk

Tanner Vea job talk [Identities, ideologies, and practices.]

1. Sociocultural perspective on learning
2. Interest-based learning ecologies
3. Affect and emotion in learning

Emotion sometimes serves as explicit targets of learning. 

How are activists’ learning trajectories shaped by power and privilege? Power-practice articulations

I am interested in inside/outside (emic/etic) perspective on learning. Are you talking about the learning of the activists or the learning of the 

Feedback:  Distinguish between in-group and out-group learning.      It might be helpful to define exactly what you mean by learning. 

    Earlier, you made a case for studying extreme users. Can you connect your observations back to the work of educators working in less extreme contexts?

    Economists, for example, train themselves not to be emotional. 

Questions:

How do you distinguish between guided affect experiences and manipulation?What are the stakes for emotional experience being self-initiated or consensual? 

For me     Shades of green: Look at this as an example for cyborg camp

    Politics of learning writing collective

    Epistemic affect

    Lines of practice (acevedo)

    Oppression: Creating obstacles to the pursuit of some lines of practice. 

Hi Tanner, 

Thanks for sharing your job talk with us this afternoon. I thought you were really articulate and impressive, and wish I had gotten to know you before you were on the point of graduating. 

— At the beginning of the talk you distinguished between social-scale politics and personal-scale politics. It wasn’t clear to me how you positioned your work with respect to this dichotomy.  — You list RT as one of the media outlets picking up the story about the butcher shop. This raises other narratives (activism subverted,