Gods Earth Religion as if Matter Really
God’s Earth: Religion as if Matter Really Mattered general consensus: we’re in trouble, it’s our actions. especially tech and population growth we can’t keep our hands to ourselves (manipulative) “ecological autism” ahtoropocentrism
spirituality/ecology: belong together? process of spiritual conversion 174 “biological and existential identification with other living things” + land, earth fast or slow -> specific time and place (coalfields) “the need to build dams"
empathy feel suffering of trees, animals, land modern individuality at stake in this conversion? 176 first, the transformation, then the intellectual understanding science could be in the service of following up our ecological conversion
direct, rooted experience -> transformation, ecological conversion (self-realization) -> reinforced -> seek intellectual understanding
Comparing Christianity with “North American religion” western “concept of ‘nature’ as a religiously neutral reality non-western experience of land expanded. Feels like Muir writing about God’s presence in the Sierra
4 aboriginal concepts 1. everywhere is sacred, god-given 2. land inalienable 3. incontrovertible right of possession (Here’s the problem. Westerners feel the same way) 3. Specific individual relationship with specific places
Westerners have relationship with the whole of a landscape? // road trips Migratory societies (us) do not see intrinsic value in land First generation remains remote, alien (My Antonia) Alienation important Migrants used to support “Taming the land” “boom” world as “set of problems created by nature awaiting their technical solutions" (what would empathy for settlers look like)
Conversion (181) personal or communal crisis epistimelogical shift prophets time of decision kairos == time for decisions to be made repentance -> see yourself in perspective -> stop following “our own heart” cool sentence on hardness of heart (communal repentance allow us to step out of anthtopocentrism) recasts “humans as fulfillment of God’s plan” as sinful Who the hell is Thomas Berry??? “the affliction of the world, its demonic presence” (The Dream of the Earth, Berry)
Self-realization vulnerability in some way, connects to lower-level dependence on, rootedness in the earth we are not angels (giving up modern individuality) criticizes “anthropocentric self-righteousness” (connects to above) * going through process of conversion process, making a critique of modernity myths as shielding us from truths about ourselves “a pious self-righteousness protects so many from a genuine religious encounter with God" -> What would the ecological equivalent of this be? COSMOS CONVERSION: crisis -> repentance (self-realization) -> new attitude on life not just an allegory to spirituality, this is spiritual conversion
Is it true “only a god can save us”? Heidegger: Technology = all pervasive power in our lives and in western culture technology = mode of being -» the medium is YOU technology severs you from your ability to care about the beingness, rather you see the world in terms of usefulness, whose parameters are determined by the technology we forget “Being in all its limitless possibilities” as we become focus on technology and its particular manifestations QUOTE with fungible 187 we commodify ourselves by commodifying the world through technology—we serve the technology that we thought serves us it’s not that we’ve done wrong, it’s that we’ve become bad we already don’t decide whether to use/live as technology—that decision was made by Descartes with the invention of the modern mechanism (the original sin of technology) in order to overcome the metaphysical problem of having surrendered a world of beingness to a world of technology, we need a new non-technological, but rather theological Gestell (frame) for nature and reality we will have to “poetize” & imagine The author asks what this god will look like?
God of the modern physicists modern physics, particularly theories about the origin of the earth, calls into question the role of God as creator
Desire to be both poet and scientist—not wanting to be literal/technologist/naive about symbolism? but also not wanting to be unscientific